Is Belief in God Enough?

According to a June 2008 survey conducted by The Pew Forum on Religion and Public Life, 92% of Americans believe in God or a universal spirit. What does it mean to believe in God? Is belief in God the same as faith in God?

The Bible is clear that faith is more than just belief. It says, “You say you have faith, for you believe that there is one God. Good for you! Even the demons believe this, and they tremble in terror (James 2:19).”

One gets the sense that faith takes belief to another level – that faith is belief with a purpose.

Last Sunday night, I heard Dr. Paul D. Tripp speak on the topic, “What is Faith?” Dr. Tripp agrees that faith is belief in the existence of God; however, he takes it a step further and focuses on the implications that flow out of faith in God. According to Tripp, if one has faith in God, one must believe that God is Creator, God is Sovereign, and God is Savior.

If you have faith in God, you must believe that God is Creator. The earth is not a cosmic accident. It was created by God and was created with a purpose. The Bible says, “God created everything through him (Jesus), and nothing was created except through him (John 1:3).”

If God created everything, we are His creations. As creations, we are not our own. We belong to Him. We were created for His purposes. He can do with us as He pleases. How foolish for us as God’s creations to try and live our lives apart from our Creator or to question His purposes.

Faith in God also means believing God is sovereign. God is the supreme ruler with absolute power and authority over His creation. Not only has God created the world and everything in it, He sustains and controls it. Nothing happens without his knowledge and permission. The Bible says,

“God promised everything to the Son (Jesus) as an inheritance, and through the Son he created the universe. The Son radiates God’s own glory and expresses the very character of God, and he sustains everything by the mighty power of his command (Hebrews 1:2-3).”

Faith in God means believing He is Creator and believing He is in charge. Yet all of us live our lives like we are in charge. We all reject God’s authority over us and His standards. The Bible says, “All of us, like sheep, have strayed away. We have left God’s paths to follow our own (Isaiah 53:6).” It also says, “For everyone has sinned; we all fall short of God’s glorious standard (Romans 3:23).”

Sin is not something made up by men to make others feel guilty. It is man’s rejection of God’s authority and standards. It is our rejection of Him.

This brings us to the third thing we must believe if we are to have faith in God – God is Savior. If God is Savior, it implies we need saving. From what do we need to be saved? From our rejection of God and His authority over us – our sin. The Bible says, “the wages of sin is death (Romans 6:23).” The consequence for our rejection of God is separation from Him forever.

But there is good news! Our Sovereign Creator God has provided a way to save us from our rejection of Him. The Bible says, “But God demonstrates his own love for us in this: While we were still sinners, Christ died for us (Romans 5:8).” And again, “For God loved the world so much that he gave his one and only Son, so that everyone who believes in him will not perish but have eternal life (John 3:16).”

What about you? Are you one of the 92% of Americans that believe in God? What difference does that make in your life? What do you believe about Him? Do you know Him as Creator, King and Savior?

The Truth Will Set You Free

The cover story of the June 20, 2009 edition of World Magazine is entitled "The Sixth Wind?" by Marvin Olasky. The article argues that although the headlines may trumpet a decline in Christianity in America, a closer look suggests a rise in serious faith.

Olasky writes how Christianity's main religious opponents, Islam and Hinduism, "can only hold onto their flocks by banning or persecuting missionaries and attempting to restrict discussion. They fear open debate."

Olasky then quotes John Milton (pictured), who wrote in 1644:

"Though all the winds of doctrine were let loose to play on the earth, so Truth be in the field, we do injuriously by licensing and prohibiting misdoubt her strength. Let her and Falsehood grapple; who ever knew Truth put to the worse in a free and open encounter?"

There's no need for Christians to be depressed. Truth always wins in the end.

God Doesn't Shrug

Well I did it. It wasn’t easy, but I finally did it. I finished reading “Atlas Shrugged.” All 1,084 pages of it. My copy of the “Holy Bible” has 1,048 pages. This book is long.

A colleague of mine loaned me his copy (the original Signet paperback, in case you’re interested in that kind of thing) of “Atlas Shrugged” after hearing me give my two cents about the current economic turmoil. He said I would find the book relevant.

Relevant? Could a book written over 50 years ago (1957) by a woman who died more than 25 years ago (Ayn Rand) have anything relevant to say about today’s economic and political environment? I was amazed. It turns out I’m not the only one. “Atlas Shrugged” is #78 on Amazon’s current best seller list and has been one of their top 100 sellers for 101 days straight. Did I mention this book was written over 50 years ago?

“Atlas Shrugged” tells the story of a U.S. economy that is collapsing under the weight of government regulation and taxation. Those in power blame the wealthy capitalists for all of the nation’s ills and try to level the playing field by redistributing their wealth through taxation and finally nationalizing their businesses (sound familiar?). Finally, the capitalists, who are carrying the weight of the world on their shoulders for little reward or appreciation, decide to quit and go on strike (Atlas shrugs). Without the capitalists around to produce goods and create wealth, there is nothing left to fund the largesse of the welfare state and it collapses upon itself.

As I read the first three quarters of the book, I kept finding myself agreeing with Rand out loud. Our government continues to confiscate more and more of the money belonging to its most productive citizens and redistributing it to those who are less productive. Even now, as it struggles to find more money to confiscate, our government has borrowed over $11 trillion (much of it from other countries) to pay for Social Security, Medicare, and other entitlement programs. Who will be left standing when the music stops? It’s not going to be pretty.

As much as I agreed with the first three quarters of the book, I disagreed all the more with the rest of it. Near the end of the book, the hero of the story, John Galt, gives an impassioned speech that literally goes on for more than 90 pages. The speech makes an intellectual case for Ayn Rand’s philosophy – the philosophy of Objectivism. Rand describes her philosophy as:

“the concept of man as a heroic being, with his own happiness as the moral purpose of his life, with productive achievement as his noblest activity, and reason as his only absolute.”

According to Rand, the chief end of man is his own happiness. Man’s glory is his ability to think and produce. Charity and altruism are incompatible with his nature.

The whole time I was reading Galt’s speech, I kept thinking of Solomon’s writings in Ecclesiates:

“I came to hate all my hard work here on earth, for I must leave to others everything I have earned. And who can tell whether my successors will be wise or foolish? Yet they will control everything I have gained by my skill and hard work under the sun. How meaningless! So I gave up in despair, questioning the value of all my hard work in this world. Some people work wisely with knowledge and skill, then must leave the fruit of their efforts to someone who hasn’t worked for it. This, too, is meaningless, a great tragedy. So what do people get
in this life for all their hard work and anxiety? Their days of labor are filled with pain and grief; even at night their minds cannot rest. It is all meaningless (Ecclesiates 2:18-23, New Living Translation).”

Rand says productive achievement is man’s noblest activity. Solomon says that without God, productive achievement is meaningless, filled with pain and grief.

Although Rand’s philosophy of rational self-interest may have merits as an economic or political system, it is incompatible with a Christian worldview. God is not welcome in Rand’s philosophy. To Rand, a sovereign God is an obstacle to man’s pursuit of his own interests. If you want to read a great essay by John Piper that both extols and critiques Rand’s philosophy, click here.

If anyone has a reason to shrug, it’s God. He created man in His own image so man can love and enjoy Him forever. He placed him in an idyllic garden and gave him everything his heart could desire. All God asked for in return was man’s love and obedience. But man decided to go his own way. He turned his back on God and disobeyed Him. When man learned the consequences of his sin, he blamed God. We do the same today. After all He’s done for us, who would blame God if He shrugged and went on strike? God has every right to quit on us, leave us to our own devices, and let the world collapse upon itself.

But what has God done instead? He became a man Himself. He went around healing the sick, giving sight to the blind, and teaching about God’s kingdom. What was man’s response? We nailed Him to a cross.

Surely after this injustice God would have every reason to shrug and leave the scene. But, no. He raised Jesus from the dead and brought Him back to heaven. What’s more – whoever believes in Jesus – whoever, receives Him as their Savior – will live forever with God as one of His children.

What a great God! To Him be glory and honor forever.

Good News

Yesterday I had a discussion about God with a colleague at work. He brought it up – I didn’t.

Mike grew up in a Christian home, was educated in Christian schools, and even attended a Christian college. Today he’s agnostic.

He believes there’s a God. He even thinks God probably loves him. He’s just not sure what God is like or what God expects of him. He doesn’t think the Bible is authoritative because it was “written by men with an agenda.” He thinks everyone follows the same God – Christian, Jew, and Muslim. He’s also not sure what to believe about Jesus. He likes his teachings but just doesn’t trust what others have written about him.

If you ask Mike what keeps him from Christianity, he’s quick to respond – it’s Christians.

You see, Mike has a bad history with Christians. It started in his teen years when his sister committed suicide. At the funeral, while trying to share the gospel with those present, the minister made it clear his sister could not be in heaven because of her actions. Mike was incensed. Is this what God was all about? Follow the rules or be on the outside.

Mike’s parents made him go to a Christian college even though he didn’t want to. More rules. Little grace. Mike broke as many rules as he could and got himself kicked out.

He sees all Christians as setting up rules and forcing everyone else to follow. Think Moral Majority. It’s not lost on me that I haven’t been able to change his perception. At least not yet.

The gospel is supposed to be good news. Jesus said, “Come to me, all of you who are weary and carry heavy burdens, and I will give you rest.” (Matthew 11:28; New Living Translation) We can do nothing to save ourselves. Christ has done it all. And yet, for some reason, we often imply that more needs to be done. When we do this, we add weight to the weary. Instead of rest, we wear them out.

God isn’t finished with Mike. He’s not finished with me either. There’s not a thing either one of us can do to earn God’s favor. This is good news.

Who’s Really Intolerant?

We often hear today that Christians are intolerant – you know, how all they want to do is force their beliefs on everyone else.

Which brings me to the Miss USA pageant held this past Sunday in Las Vegas.

Miss California, Carrie Prejean, had made it to the final fifteen and was supposedly one of the favorites to win it all. Having made it past the swim suit and evening gown rounds, she now came to the part of the competition where she had to answer a single question in front of the five judges.

Her questioner? Perez Hilton, a celebrity blogger, openly gay self-described ‘queen of all media’, and one of the competition’s judges. The question? “Vermont recently became the fourth state to legalize same sex marriage. Do you think every state should follow suit? Why or why not?”

After a brief pause, Prejean replied:

“Well I think it’s great that Americans are able to choose one or the other. We live in a land where you can choose same sex marriage or opposite marriage. And you know what? In my country, in my family, I think I believe a marriage should be between a man and a woman. No offense to anybody out there but that’s how I was raised and that’s how I think it should be – between a man and a woman. Thank you very much.”

How did the crowd respond? They booed.

How did Perez Hilton respond? After the pageant he called Miss Prejean a dumb bitch on his blog and went on to describe her as having half a brain. He also said he would have stormed onto the stage and ripped off her tiara had she won. Nice.

How did Carrie Prejean respond after her answer may have lost her the title and she was named runner-up? She said:

“I have no regrets about answering the question honestly. He asked me for my opinion and I gave it to him. I have nothing against gay people, and I didn’t mean to offend anyone in my answer.”

Now I have no idea whether Miss California’s answer cost her the crown. That’s not my point. What I find ironic is the same people who call Christians intolerant will not themselves tolerate any disagreement with their agenda.

To Perez Hilton, it doesn’t matter if Carrie Prejean has anything against gay people or whether she meant to offend anyone. To him, her position is intolerable.

And who’s trying to force whose beliefs on everyone else?

Hard Hearts

The controversy over Pope Benedict XVI’s recent comments on the use of condoms in the fight against the spread of AIDS in Africa continues. For those of you who missed it, the pontiff essentially said you can’t resolve the AIDS problem with the distribution of condoms. The answer, he said, is a responsible and moral attitude toward sex including abstinence and monogamy.

The predictable outrage from activists and government officials ensued. French human rights minister Rama Yade said she was "dumbfounded" by the pope's comments. Foreign Minister Bernard Kouchner called them "the opposite of tolerance and understanding." The Belgian parliament passed a resolution calling them "unacceptable" and demanded Belgium's government officially protest.

What did they expect from the leader of a church that holds the position that sex outside of marriage is wrong?

The whole affair reminds me of Jesus’ teaching about divorce in Matthew 19. The Pharisees came up to Jesus and tested him by asking, “Should a man be allowed to divorce his wife for just any reason?” Jesus responded that marriage was instituted by God and “let no one split apart what God has joined together.” The Pharisees thought they had him where they wanted him. “Aha! Then why did Moses say in the law that a man could give his wife a written notice of divorce and send her away?” Now Jesus had them right where he wanted them. He said:

“Moses permitted divorce only as a concession to your hard hearts, but it was not what God had originally intended.”

Not what God originally intended. That says it all, doesn’t it?

God originally intended that man and woman would stay together for life in a committed relationship and would not have sex outside that relationship. Once again, mankind has rebelled and gone his own way.

Should condoms be condoned to slow the spread of AIDS? Only as a concession to our hard hearts. It is not what God had originally intended.

Is God a Republican or a Democrat?

The other day someone asked my youngest daughter what made her parents mad. Her answer?

Politics.

What I hoped to hear was something like – oh, I don’t know – maybe when others dishonor God, or injustice, or sin. But politics? Ouch.

What is it about politics that arouses such passion?

Recently, I’ve picked up Amy E. Black’s book, Beyond Left and Right: Helping Christians Make Sense of American Politics (Baker Books 2008). In it, Dr. Black, a Wheaton College political science professor, suggests four principles to guide Christians developing a framework for thinking about politics.

1. We all “see things imperfectly as in a cloudy mirror” (I Corinthians 13:12a; New Living Translation) and therefore should exercise genuine humility when discussing politics.


In other words, I don’t know it all, so I should stop acting like I do.


2. The diversity of the body of Christ makes room for Christians to disagree on many political matters.


Really? You mean since I don’t know it all, maybe I can learn something from a brother or sister in Christ with whom I disagree politically?


3. The label “Christian” is for God and His work, not to validate human endeavors like politics.


As much as I may hate to admit it, God is not a Republican or Democrat. He’s not a Liberal or Conservative. He’s not a mascot for one party or the other. When we take our politics and try to hang God’s name on it, we use His name in vain.


4. Politics can and should be a means for demonstrating love in action and building the body of Christ.


Jesus said, “By this all men will know that you are my disciples, if you love one another.” (John 13:35; New Living Translation) How will others know we are followers of Christ? Not how we vote. Not what school of economics we adhere to. As the song says, “They’ll know we are Christians by our love.”

The next time someone asks my daughter what makes her parents mad, I hope she’ll be able to give a different answer.